Slotkin and Rogers Attack Each Other’s Records in Michigan Senate Debate

In a heated debate between Republican John James and Democratic incumbent Gary Peters for the Michigan Senate seat, their respective campaigns have been trading attacks on each other’s records. But in a recent debate hosted by Detroit Public Television, the focus shifted to the candidates vying for Michigan’s 8th Congressional District seat: Democrat Elissa Slotkin and Republican Paul Junge.

Slotkin, a former CIA analyst and Pentagon official, is seeking a second term in Congress after flipping the district from red to blue in 2018. Junge, a former local television news anchor and prosecutor, is hoping to unseat her in a competitive race that has attracted national attention.

During the debate, Slotkin and Junge wasted no time in going after each other’s records. Slotkin criticized Junge for his ties to special interest groups and accused him of being out of touch with the needs of Michigan residents. She also hammered him for his lack of experience in government and his support for President Trump’s policies.

Junge, on the other hand, attacked Slotkin for her votes on healthcare and the economy, claiming that she is too liberal for the district. He also accused her of being a career politician who is more concerned with advancing her own agenda than representing the interests of her constituents.

The two candidates sparred over a range of issues, including healthcare, the economy, immigration, and the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Slotkin touted her bipartisan record and highlighted her efforts to bring federal funding to the district for infrastructure projects and small businesses. Junge criticized her for voting against the Paycheck Protection Program and accused her of supporting policies that would hurt small businesses.

Overall, the debate between Slotkin and Junge was a fiery exchange of ideas and accusations. Both candidates made their case to the voters of Michigan’s 8th Congressional District, and it will be up to them to decide who is best suited to represent their interests in Washington. The race is expected to be close, and the outcome could have a significant impact on the balance of power in Congress.